Thursday, December 21, 2006

Judy Rebick's decision to leave the Green Party because of fellow feminist, Elizabeth Mays comments about abortion shouldn't be misunderstood as a moral move. You have to have them to act on them.
To date, we haven't seen anything from Mzz. Rebick, Mzz. Green Party or Mzz. May that could be mistaken for any of the virtues except maybe for zeal. Mzz. Mays temporary reprieve for the unborn will be soon be withdrawn and the three stooges will be one big happy family again proving once again that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Rural Rage with Country Sage

The Corporate Season

Somewhere between the angelic television commercials offering us the miraculous opportunity to purchase the Christmas Spirit, plus tax, the TV networks try to squeeze in the odd, semi-intelligent moment of programming. If anyone out there has ever found that moment, please, let us all know.
Maybe all the department stores send couriers up to Heaven each Christmas, via air miles, with a list of the people who spent the most money, hoping to secure themselves a piece of the rock just in case there’s any truth to this Jesus thing that keeps getting in their way to profit-nirvana. Don’t laugh; judging by the sales records and the empty parking lots at the churches, many people must believe it. Mind you, churches that have swallowed the fem/gay agenda are doing a pretty good job of driving out their faithful on their own.
The other slimy part of all this is that the big box stores and the TV networks want to exclude Christmas and make it ‘Holiday Season’ exclusively, but they also want us to keep the ‘feel-good’ feeling about Christmas so we’ll continue to spend with our emotions instead of our head. Of course it would help them immensely when they march into our provincial legislator’s office and demand to be open on Dec. 25th since ‘Holiday Season’ will not be a religious event anymore. Watch for it and don’t expect any help from our legislators. They sold their souls years ago.
Frankly, it wouldn’t make any difference to many people’s spending habits if they changed the name to ‘Save Days’ or ‘Pay Days’. Somewhere, some day in the future, some woman will scratch her beard while pondering the question, “Didn’t it have a different name before?” You go girl!
The good news is, as the Grinch found out, ‘They can take away the tinsel, the tassels, the trinkets and the toys’ but, for those who teach their children, they will never, ever, take away the Spirit who is with us every day, including Christmas.
Merry Christmas!

Monday, November 27, 2006

Abort The Idea

We changed our name from Canadian Alliance to please the PC members.
We paid off the $5 million debt for the PC party before they went bankrupt.
We changed the democratic election process from the one person/ one vote system to please the PC members.
We dropped the whole question of abortion for the election.
Now the Conservative party wants to force candidates to not even answer questionnaires about abortion.
Since when does the minority speak for the majority of Conservatives? Isn't this more of a liberal/NDP idea?
Fellow bloggers. Let your MP know what you think of this idea.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

The fem/gay way.
"Marriage has existed for the benefit of men. It is a legally sanctioned method of control over women. We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore, it is important to encourage women to leave their husbands and not live individually with men. All history must be rewritten in terms of the oppression of women. We must go back to the ancient female religions like witchcraft."- The Declaration of Feminism ( Nov., 1971).
By 1975, feminist organizations in North America were frustrated with their slow progress, so they arranged a meeting with 5,000 lesbians and gays in the U.S. and came to an agreement. Lesbians and gays would use all their considerable resources to help the feminist cause and afterwards feminist organizations would help lesbians and gays to achieve their goals.
With the help of Hollywood, liberal media, sympathetic politicians and Pierre Trudeau's Bill of Rights the voice for feminist 'equality' spread quickly. By the 1990's the 'equality' of women's rights had been established. It was now the gay activists turn for emancipation.
Recycling the same mantra of the feminist cause, out of the closet gays and lesbians demanded tolerance, equality and human rights, with the Bill of Rights, feminist activists, Hollywood, most journalists, TV networks and a host of politicians to back them up.
Behind the scenes, corporations have been supporting both causes. Bell and it's networks support agencies that attack life and family issues. The Ford Motor Co. supports gay programs and an anti-Catholic organization. Proctor & Gamble backs a homosexual agenda and the list is endless. The more instability in society, the larger the profit. Stable, thinking, moral societies spend moderately and live modestly.
In spite of all the help, gay organizers still had to overcome society’s morality and religious institutions. The corporate media, using gay friendly programs, pornography and shows that stimulate stupidity are doing their greedy best to reduce people’s integrity to their lowest level. At the same time they attack religious institutions by relentlessly persuading the public, because of the infrequent priests and ministers who fell well short of their calling that all religious institutions are not to be trusted, ignoring the millions of faithful who gave to society all their lives, over hundreds of years.
Same- sex marriage isn't about 'equality' anymore than feminism was. It's about getting into our school system and changing the curriculum to suite their selfish agenda.
If nothing else, these handful of extreme activists have made Christians, Jews, Muslims, Islamic and religious institutions have a good hard look at what they really believe in and how far they will go to stand up for it. Some are already failing by their silence in the debate, thus abandoning their flock and leaving the decision up to a self-indulgent, immature government.
The question is, what are you doing about it?

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Marriage

Marriage is an intimate personal union to which a man and woman consent, consummated and continually nourished by sexual intercourse, and perfected in a life-long partnership of mutual love and commitment. It is also a social institution regulated by the Word of God and by the laws and customs which a society develops to safeguard its own continuity and welfare. The Creator made man and woman, displaying His full image only as man and woman. Each is made for the other, their essential natures being complimentary and brought into oneness in marriage.
Husband and wife both share and perpetuate their happiness in having and rearing a family, thus marriage is more than an end in itself; it is the means to ends outside the married couple. Husband and wife become one in relation to the community, so that through marriage a new social unit emerges.
The exclusive sexual relation between husband and wife points to the exclusive commitment of total responsibility for each other. The sexual communion speaks of a pervading possessiveness, each partner offering a precious gift to the other which has been exclusively preserved for that one alone.
The total unity of man and woman in marriage, understood in the expression ‘one flesh’, demands monogamy along with male and female exclusiveness.
When it comes to moral or spiritual matters, the intellectual elites and the brain-dead share equal space in the parliamentary and media wards. It’s quite natural for them to change what they simply don’t understand. The weak fear what they don’t understand and what they can’t comprehend is the positive strengths like integrity, honour, faith and commitment which many marriages still cling to.
This coming fall, our federal government will once again bring the definition of marriage to the table for discussion and voting. The extreme activists and the national media will pour their biased views on to the public again so we can’t expect to have a fair or equal public hearing on the subject. The only effective tool we have is to reach the anti-marriage liberal/NDP MP’s across Canada, perhaps, through our friends and relatives.