It takes a real woman to expose the false feminists.

Fed on myths, preying on men

Barbara Kay, National Post

Published: Saturday, December 06, 2008



http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=1039527

November was Domestic Violence Awareness month. Truth in advertising suggests it should be Y-Chromosome Apartheid Month. Far from promoting "awareness" of a social problem or remedies for men and women with anger issues, the month is basically a radical feminist war dance around the Original Sin of maleness, cheered on by "progressive" media sympathizers.

The annual verbal pogrom will find its apotheosis in to-day's 19th observance of the Montreal Massacre anniversary, our domestic violence industry's shrine to feminism's Big Lie of male unilateralism in domestic violence.

It's awkward that the Dec. 6, 1989 massacre of 14 women at Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal -- unlike ritual wartime massacres of men and boys, such as the 8,000-death horror of Srebrenica -- remains a freak one-off in the West, perpetrated by a lone sociopath, with neither prequel nor sequel to suggest a pattern. But emotion, not reason or facts, drives the Domestic Violence industry.

The truth is that the more precisely identified phenomenon of "intimate partner violence" (IPV) in Western culture is gender neutral, an acting out of psychological problems around intimacy that afflict men and women alike. IPV is initiated by both sexes in about equal proportions. Self-defence is rarely the motive for women's violence against men. Literally hundreds of peer-reviewed, community-based studies, including StatsCan's, confirm this. But they don't reach the public. (Under pressure from feminist organizations, for example, a Quebec health agency recently sequestered a commissioned psychosocial study showing men and women are equally culpable for IPV.)

But most damaging is the suppressed fact that even bilateral IPV in general is a relative rarity in our culture. A woman is more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by her spouse. IPV simply isn't the systemic epidemic that hysteria-mongering feminist organizations so shamelessly project.

Since 1980, the Quebec government has sanctioned the "fact" that 250,000-300,000 women over the age of 15 suffer IPV from their partners or husbands annually. Actually, about 14,000 Quebec women and 2,500 men annually report themselves victims of conjugal violence. Allegations deemed worthy of trial, however, are dramatically fewer in number.

Recently, the Quebec government abruptly withdrew its wildly conjectural 300,000 figure from Google-accessible circulation, after a pertinacious group of independent researchers demanded to know its source through the Access to Information Act. There was no source, of course. Yet financial allocations remain pegged to the mythical 300,000 and are exclusively awarded to women's projects.

This year, the Quebec Auditor-General's report focused an accusatory light on fiscal profligacy and lack of oversight in the women's abuse industry. Grants to abuse-related women's projects have soared from $30-million in 2002-2003 to $60-million in 2007-08. One six-bed shelter's grants in that period bounced from $58,832 to $406,817, even though the shelter only served nine women throughout 2006-07.

Almost half a million dollars to house nine women? Yet a bamboozled public believes thousands upon thousands of battered women are seeking refuge.

Reality just doesn't jibe with that picture. In 2004, the Yellow Brick House, an Aurora, Ont., shelter closed during a labour dispute. It emerged that of the eight women and three children residing there, only one woman was fleeing abuse. The others were homeless.

Exceptions, believers will say. Everyone "knows" violence against women is epidemic.

Really? Edmonton Police Service reports from 1999-2000 indicate the police responded to 3,000 domestic incidents. They referred exactly 24 women--less than 1% -- to shelters.

That 1% figure recurs again and again. The co-ordinator of Cornwall Commmunity Hospital's Assault and Sexual Abuse Program in Cornwall, Ont., claims that "17-30% of all women treated in hospital emergency departments are victims of domestic violence." Reality check: Her own hospital's screening for abuse of 157,000 in-patients turned up only 150 IPV-related injuries (both sexes).

I'll conclude with the words of a former batterer, Linda Kinsella. When her unprovoked anger turned to rage, Kinsella used to scapegoat her disabled husband by tipping over his wheelchair and otherwise abusing him. Adding to his nightmare, the police (typically, stupidly) arrested him when called to the scene.

Therapy for Linda saved their marriage. A repentant Kinsella asks: "If women are able to do all the good things that men can do in [the] professions ... then why [do] we, as a society, deny that women can do the bad too? It is my fondest hope that someday there will be true equality in our society and that domestic violence will be seen not as a gender issue but as a societal one that will end when we work together to stop it."

Amen, brothers and sisters.

bkay@videotron.ca

This is a wacky coup d'état worthy of a banana republic by three stooges:

a socialist, a separatist, a citizen of France.

The day the Bloc Quebecois joined the government
By Ezra Levant on December 1, 2008 11:52 PM

A few quick thoughts on the coup d’etat, in no particular order.

1. The math here is pretty simple: in a Parliament of 308 MPs, a Prime Minister needs 155 to govern with a majority. Stephen Harper came pretty close with 143, up 19 from the last election. The Liberals and NDP combined have just 114 MPs combined, down 18 from the last election. So it is mathematically impossible for the Liberals to be installed as the government without the Bloc Quebecois’ explicit help. Without formally including the Bloc in a coalition, Stephane Dion would be going to Governor-General Michaelle Jean with 114 MPs – a non-starter. With the Bloc, he’s got 163.



2. Without the Bloc, the Liberals and NDP have even less of a claim after the recent election than they did before. The Conservative vote, measured as a percentage, has grown five elections in a row. The Liberal vote, measured as a percentage, has declined four elections in a row. Trivia: in terms of absolute vote count, Stephen Harper received more votes in 2008 (5.21 million) than Paul Martin did in 2004 (4.98 million) or Jean Chretien received in his 1997 election (4.99 million) which earned him a majority. Harper’s 2008 count roughly tied Chretien’s 2000 majority result, too (5.25 million).



3. In other words, the Bloc’s formal, explicit participation is essential for the Liberal-NDP coalition to work. But, until now, the Liberals and NDP had been politically, if not morally, averse to coalescing with them. The reasons are obvious: they’re secessionists, who explicitly call for the disintegration of Canada. Pierre Trudeau and Jean Chretien both made opposing Quebec separatists one of their signature policies. (Chretien undid that legacy by participating in the negotiations this weekend; Justin Trudeau, now an MP himself, likewise departed from his father’s Quebec legacy by agreeing to the deal, too.) What changed? It’s obvious – Harper’s short-lived plan to remove the public subsidy from political parties, which would have put the opposition at a disadvantage. Opposition claims that it was a disagreement over economic substance are incredible. Not only has the opposition approved every Tory budget to date, but just a week ago they voted to accept the Throne Speech which was, at least in general terms, exactly what the Conservatives proposed in their fiscal update.


Continued....

http://ezralevant.com/2008/12/the-day-the-bloc-quebecois-joi.html

Every year the CBC offers up this garbage at Christmas with our money.

THE PAGAN CHRIST

Thursday December 6, 2007 at 9pm on CBC-TV
repeating Saturday February 9 at 10pm ET on CBC Newsworld
There are 2.1 billion Christians on the planet – roughly one third of the entire human population. At the heart of their religion is the New Testament and the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. To Christianity, the written word is the glue that binds the faith of its followers.

So, what if it could be proven that Jesus never existed? What if there was evidence that every word of the New Testament – the cornerstone of Christianity – is based on myth and metaphor?

Based on Tom Harpur’s national bestseller, The Pagan Christ examines these very questions. During his research, Harpur discovered that the New Testament is wholly based on Egyptian mythology, that Jesus Christ never lived, and that – indeed – the text was always meant to be read allegorically. It was the founders of the Church who duped the world into taking a literal approach to the scriptures. And, according to Harpur, this was their fatal error – and the very reason Christianity is struggling today.

The mission of The Pagan Christ is not to accelerate Christianity’s slow demise, but to breath new life into its holy book and, in the process, bring the world a richer, more spiritual faith.
See other dates here:

http://www.cbc.ca/search/cbc?ie=utf8&site=CBC&output=xml_no_dtd&getfields=description&oe=utf8&safe=high&q=pagan+christ

Sick Daze at CBC

According to government Access to Information documents obtained by Sunmedia, CBC spent $15 Million for employee sick days in 2006/07. A majority of those sick days went to the French CBC radio and TV staff in Quebec.
Canadians pay approximately $500 each per year for 'cultural concepts' like museums, libraries, etc. but around 80% of that money goes to the CBC, CRTC and Can. Television Fund.
Studies have shown that cultural spending is overwhelmingly consumed by the well-to-do and paid for by the masses of poorer people who don't even listen to or watch the wasteful public broadcaster.
Snubbing its’ nose at rural Canada, CBC is well known for promoting 'alternate' and radical feminist life choices in its’ broadcasts such as airing the first live homosexual 'wedding' on a cold Sabbath day in Feb/04 and avoiding equal time for differing opinions.
We're happy for the 6% of Canadian elites who actually view CBC but the majority of us are fed up with our public funds going to pay for utter stupidity, biased, agenda-driven reporting, huge salaries and in case I didn't mention it, biased, agenda-driven reporting. On top of all that we have Public Television with its’ own agendas.
CBC may have been relevant 50 years ago when there was a shortage of information networks but today, with a broad variety of providers, plus the internet, the CBC has become a Billion dollar a year, obsolete and unnecessary yoke on Canadian taxpayers who prefer to spend their money on their own choices, like any other charity.
Since when is it the publics responsibility to support a socialist enterprise that losses hundreds of millions of dollars every year? At a time when the real market industry is looking for financial support, it is irresponsible for our government to be pouring our money into frivolous enterprises like the arts and entertainment world.
CBC content is made in the big cities, for the big cities and, like all of the pollution they send us, is unneeded and unwanted by most rural citizens.
If our cultural elites want to listen to classical radio and watch 'Steve and Chris' every day, let them pay for it, sick days included.

The Women Who Have Abortions, and the Love They Need

by Dr. Jeff Mirus At Catholic Culture

The November/December issue of Envoy Magazine includes an article by Jane Brennan, entitled “How Could She Do That?”, about what motivates a woman to have an abortion. Jane herself had two abortions, worked with Planned Parenthood, and helped her sister get an abortion before she finally began to reevaluate everything she believed. Now she does pro-life counseling.

The article is not a statistical analysis; it is simply Jane’s own story. For Jane, feminist ideology, the lies of abortionists and their advertisements, limited understanding of the biological and metaphysical issues, widespread social acceptance, abusive relationships both as a child and as an adult, and a deep fear that each of her first two pregnancies would ruin her life all combined to drive her into the abortion culture. After her second abortion, Jane divorced an abusive husband. She later met and married a man who treated her well. Unfortunately, she needed counseling and chose to get it from a radical feminist counselor. The result was that she generally made her husband’s life a kind of hell. But when he moved out, she was shocked and upset enough to begin questioning everything the counselor had been telling her. Jane realized she had to change. Her husband moved back in. And Jane did change, ultimately finding relief and new life in a Catholic Church.

The point of Jane Brennan’s article is that pro-lifers need to try to understand the mindset of women who get abortions, as well as the problems they experience afterwards. She feels that many pro-lifers find the decision to abort incomprehensible, and that this limits their ability to reach these women. Brennan recommends that the pro-life movement make better use of women who have had abortions (such as those in the group Silent No More) to make presentations at parishes and elsewhere which will encourage other post-abortive women to begin to turn their lives around, and help pre-abortive women to do the same. As she says in her conclusion:

Then the grim reality of how abortion shatters lives would be heard, and soon it would not be thought of as a clinical procedure or a fundamental right but the tragedy it is. This might cause people to say, “I don’t want that to happen to my daughter, my sister, my girlfriend, or to me. In fact I don’t want abortion to happen at all.”
Brennan’s story is powerful and moving. While I think most people who work in pro-life counseling are far more sympathetic to the plight of women seeking abortions than Brennan tends to believe, there is no arguing with her recommendation that the pro-life movement should make greater use of personal testimony from those who have had abortions.

The pro-life movement also needs to make use of men who can get out the message of what it means to love. Brennan reveals this need in her own story when she notes that it was the departure of a man who actually treated her well that finally jolted her out of her self-centered, self-defeating philosophy of life. I have long argued that too many problems of contemporary women (especially the kind of problems that drive them to abortion) are caused by men who either do not know how to be men, or who refuse to be men—men who use women as toys, abandoning them when they no longer find them fun. Fathers who abuse and/or abandon their daughters; lovers and husbands who abuse and/or abandon their wives: These men are architects of insecurity and anger in women, both of which fuel feminism and a culture of death.

It is no coincidence that the wildly popular film Bella makes precisely this point; the film's hero ought to become a role model for males. My own prescription, therefore, is that in addition to inviting post-abortive women to become increasingly involved in pro-life work, we also need to recruit good men who can help spread the message of what it really means to love. Men must not only explain but demonstrate with their lives what it means to love a woman as Christ loves the Church. There will always be exceptions, and some good men have been devastated by a wife's decision to abort. Nonetheless, I think it is not too much to say that the single most important force in ending the epidemic of abortion is something men have the power to do: Love.

Our Kangaroo Courts in the Media

Is the media a credible source for information anymore?

Suppose, for a moment, that unborn babies started growing outside a woman’s womb instead of the inside. Connected by the umbilical cord until full maturity the mother could watch its progress. At any time she could cut the umbilical cord with a quick slash of a knife, killing the child. Only the mother would be personally responsible for the death.

I don’t think we would have many abortions. That difference of a few inches from the inside to the outside of the womb is literally a matter of life and death for a young child. God made the womb to be a place of holy protection for a child yet it has become a tomb for many.

Pro-abortion people have taken full advantage of the hidden child by calling it a piece of flesh but science has exposed this fraud with ultrasound pictures inside the womb. Women can now see the development of their child yet this is not enough for the pro-death media who still perpetuate the lies. If life, at any stage, has no meaning to these people, then neither does knowledge, truth and wisdom.

Is it time to give Quebec the freedom it wants?

Now that the dust has settled on our election and the numbers are in, we find that, without Quebec, we would have a majority conservative government. Take away the 50 seats the separatists won and Harper wins 143 of the 258 remaining ridings; a majority. Of course with a majority, Quebec wouldn't be able to play the 'poor us vs. them' game and get the special attention they exist upon.
Come to think of it, without Quebec we wouldn't have homosexual marriage, unfair distribution of federal transfer payments to prop up Quebec's socialist system, the lingering Kyoto agreement which would penalise the rest of Canada while Quebec's huge hydro dam makes a fortune, a second worthless language that only francophone use and a host of intrusive socialist policies that only suit a province that survives on federal monies.
If you think I'm biased toward Quebec, what about their fixation for electing a string of prime ministers that come from Quebec for 40 years and then reject Harper because he's not one of 'Da good old boys'.
Quebec has a whole different set of values which they have been forcing into our society for years and if that's what they want they should have them without Canada's support. After all, they voted for the separatist party.It's time we respected their choice to leave Canada so we can all get on with our lives.
Canada is never going to have conservative social and fiscal values as long as this yoke is on it's neck. It's time to cut our losses.

IT'S TIME FOR UNITY

There is less than 1 week until the election, an election
that will decide the next Prime Minister of Canada. The person elected will
be the Prime Minister of all Canadians, not just the Conservatives or the
Liberals. To show our solidarity as Canadians, let's all get together and
show each other our support for the candidate of your choice.

It's time that we all came together, Conservatives or Liberals alike. If you support the policies and character of Stephen Harper, please drive with your headlights
ON during the day. If you support Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Elizabeth May,
please drive with your headlights OFF at night.
Thank you for your participation in this patriotic endeavor.

Winnipeg Statement: Now in the Trash Heap of History

Social Conservatives United
News & Action Notice
_______________________________________________

After reflecting on the recent pastoral document on Humanae Vitae,
"Liberating Potential", issued by the CCCB today, I have revised my
original commentary:

http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/?p=1319

The Winnipeg Statement can now be relegated to the trash heap of history.

Regards,

John Pacheco
Social Conservatives United
www.socon.ca
www.socon.ca/or_bust/

Can this, hopefully mean the end of the 'Fully Alive' sex education and subsequent homosexual indoctrination in our Catholic schools? There are still a host of liberal agenda educators who will try to ignore this new development so it will be up to our Bishops to bring us back to sanity in education.

Eliminate the HRC's
Canada’s human rights commissions and tribunals are a system parallel to the court system. They are redundant and should be eliminated.

To the people who think that they are unique and provide a “service” different from court system, here is how they are they different:

· They are not bound by rules of evidence, precedent, or courtroom procedure.

· The state pays all the plaintiffs’ legal costs, but defendants must pay their own.

· “Feelings” are accepted as evidence.

· The “likelihood” of damages being incurred, at some indefinite time in the future, substitutes for real damages that can be shown to have been incurred.

· They have the power to “balance rights” and decide whose rights matter most in any given set of circumstances, thus citizens can never be sure, from day to day, what their rights are.

As a result, in Canada real justice is done only when HRC cases are appealed to the real courts.

Who wants to maintain the human rights commissions and tribunals? The people who want to use public money and resources to attack and smear their political opponents.

They have become an instrument for enforcing one’s own views using public money.

They are seeds of "cultural change" implanted into the bureaucracy by previous left-wing governments.

They have become a lobby group paid by the public purse.

They cannot be “reformed”, but need to be eliminated.

Giuseppe Gori, Leader
Family Coalition Party of Ontario

Prominent Psychiatrist: "No Particular Need for Sex-Education"


Commentary by Dr. Philip Ney

OTTAWA, September 4, 2008 (LifeSitenews.com) - I am a retired professor of psychiatry, having taught in 5 universities in different parts of Canada, Hong Kong and New Zealand. I have also run child and adolescent psychiatric units. I have been on school boards. It is from a review of the literature and from my experience that I write this brief opinion.

1) There is no particular need for "sex education." For many centuries there was no sex education, yet children were conceived and their parents enjoyed the process. Discovery of each other and what is pleasant in bed, on the wedding night and thereafter, is an important part of the exciting and unique pleasure that bonds the couple.

2) Sex education inhibits pair bonding. To educate young people about something that comes naturally robs them of the spontaneity and joy of sex that is vitally important for pair bonding and thus family stability.

3) The more sex education, the more sexual self-consciousness. There is substantial evidence that the more sex education, especially on technique, the more the couple is sexually inhibited. The greater the emphasis on sexual performance, the less communication and interpersonal intimacy there is.

4) The more sex education, the more sexual activity. It is quite conclusive now, that the more sex education, the more sexual activity and all the problems that go with that. The introduction of sex education is well correlated with the increase in abortion, STDs and boy-girl interpersonal problems. Good education gives people the desire to try it out or learn more experientially. Paradoxically, in that respect, current forms of sex education are good education but have the wrong results.

5) The earlier the sex education, the younger children explore sex and try various sexual techniques. Present evidence makes it possible to also conclude that the earlier the sex education, the earlier the sexual behavior. Thus sexual education is sexual titillation.

6) In preventing disease and pregnancy, sex education has been a failure. Sex education has had the opposite effect in preventing young people from engaging in "risky sexual behavior."

7) The idea of "safe sex" has failed. Frightening children with the dangers of "unprotected sex", drugs, fast driving, alcohol, etc. for many children has the paradoxical effect of increasing their interest in trying it.

8) The reliance on condoms has been dangerously misleading. There are sexually transmitted diseases (eg. Human Papilloma Virus) for which condoms offer no protection. The most effective use of the best condoms offers 87% protection from lethal HIV, transmitted by anal intercourse. Condom use has failed particularly in Africa. Condom use creates the false impression of safety, thus encouraging sex, when there is a 13% (at least) chance of dying as a result.

9) There is nothing in sex education that cannot be part of a more effective general health education. Everything of value in sex education can be integrated with the necessary knowledge of how the body and mind work. We found that by using the young person's curiosity and letting them discover how their heart, lungs etc. work, gives them a natural desire to protect something very precious - their body and mind.

10) The sex industry profits from sex education. There is an enormous sex industry that financially profits from natural biological drives and makes billions on fashions, condoms, contraceptives, etc. It is understandable they contribute to the sex problems.

11) Sex education creates mind absorbing conflicts and preoccupations. Exposing children to sexual titillation (sex education) creates conflicts and preoccupations that interfere with their mental health, education and personal development.

12) Sex education tends to result in mental images that interfere with the appreciation of nature and art.

13) No sex education teaches the beauty and hazards of pair bonding. To my knowledge there is no sex education program that informs kids about inadvertent pair bonding. Humans are made one flesh through sex. Thus many kinds of sexual behaviour create life long pair bonds. These interfere with the intimacy and durability of a later committed marriage. Statistics indicate that the more "premarital" sex the more extramarital sex.

14) Many kinds of sex education, including "chastity" education, leave a young person with the impression that any kind of sex except vaginal intercourse is okay when it is not.


To visit Dr. Ney's website:
http://www.messengers2.com

Back to Top | Print this Story | Email to a Friend | View Story on LifeSiteNews.com

Do we really need sex education in our schools that contradicts parents ideas especially now that our schools are starting to homo-sex the education?

Massive New Poll: 56% of Canadians Oppose Morgentaler Order of Canada

Poll called 157,115 Canadian households, yielding over 13,000 respondents - Results weighted in regional proportions

July 22, 2008

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jul/08072202.html


(LifeSiteNews.com) - A random telephone poll of Canadian households with 13,324 respondents conducted between July 17-21, 2008 has revealed that 55.8% of Canadians oppose the awarding of the Order of Canada to abortionist Henry Morgentaler.

The national poll commissioned by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) and just completed, by KLRVU polling has a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 1.5%. The data is accurate 19 times out of 20. A breakdown of votes by province is provided.

Beginning with a wave on the east coasts of Newfoundland, ebbing slightly in Quebec and then continuing with a surge in Ontario right to the west coast-the tide of opinion against awarding abortionist Henry Morgentaler has risen, dramatically.

"Whatever side of the abortion debate you are on, many Canadians from all walks of life felt this appointment went way too far and offended too many," said Jim Hughes National President of CLC. "The mass media coverage of the Morgentaler award has given us the largest abortion debate this country has seen in twenty years, and Canadians when they are forced to think about abortion realize it is horrible."

In every region of the country opinion has soured considerably. Ontario is now 58 percent against honoring the infamous abortionist, with the prairies and the Atlantic provinces having two thirds of its citizens against. Even in Quebec support for Morgentaler has dropped to 53 percent.

"Clearly the waves of offended Canadians speaking out have had an impact," says Mary Ellen Douglas, National Organizer CLC. "When a former Lieutenant Governor speaks out and returns his 'Snowflake', disavowing himself from the Order, undoubtedly that is going to have an effect."

Opinion has become the most negative in the Atlantic with Nova Scotia leading the way at 68 percent against. The substantial size of the sample gives some unique insights into the regions. For instance over 400 people were surveyed in Newfoundland alone, even the territories were sampled. With over 13,000+ participants, this survey speaks definitively on the opinion within the country.

Province/Territory: Percentage Against:

BC: 55%

AB: 64%

SK: 65%

MB: 66%

ON: 58%

QC: 47%

NB: 62%

NS: 68%

PEI: 67%

NL : 64%

NWT /NT : 57%

YK : 57%

The Question: "Do you believe abortionist Henry Morgentaler deserves the Order of Canada Press 1 for Yes Press 2 for No"
A French script was used for the province of Quebec.

The extensive scientific poll called 157,115 Canadian households, yielding over 13,000 respondents and the results were weighted in regional proportions. Results have a margin of error of +/- 1.5%, 19 times out of 20. The subgroups may have larger margins of error based on concentration of population. The Targeted Population was Canadian households, respondents were a result of a households that were selected at random, using a random algorithm provided by INFOLIST Canada, of Toronto, ON. Responses were weighted according to geographical area, so that the sample would reflect the actual demographic proportions in the population, using most recent Statistics Canada estimates.

How this poll was conducted: This KLRVU poll was conducted by touchtone technology which polls households across Canada. Using this technology with the voice of a professional announcer all respondents heard the questions asked identically. In theory, with the stated sample size, one can say with 95% certainty that the results would not vary by more than the stated margin of sampling error, in one direction or the other. There are other possible sources of error in all surveys that may be more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. These include refusals to be interviewed, question wording and question order, weighting by demographic control data and the manner in which respondents are filtered (such as, determining who is a likely participant). It is difficult to quantify the errors that may result from these factors.

Fieldwork for this survey was done by KlrVu Research of Winnipeg, Manitoba. Based in Winnipeg, KLRVU Research is a privately owned polling company working private firms since 2006 research services. Core services include research, data collection and macro polling services.

Campaign Life Coalition, together with many other organizations, will continue to urge Canadians to call the Governor General's office and insist that the award be revoked.

This is Henry Morgentaler.

He is about to receive the Order of Canada award.

Here's how he earned it: http://www.abortionno.org/

Here is the letter the Alberta Human Rights Commission ruled is illegal.


Homosexual Agenda Wicked

June 17, 2002

The following is not intended for those who are suffering from an unwanted sexual identity crisis. For you, I have understanding, care, compassion and tolerance. I sympathize with you and offer you my love and fellowship. I prayerfully beseech you to seek help, and I assure you that your present enslavement to homosexuality can be remedied. Many outspoken, former homosexuals are free today.

Instead, this is aimed precisely at every individual that in any way supports the homosexual machine that has been mercilessly gaining ground in our society since the 1960s. I cannot pity you any longer and remain inactive. You have caused far too much damage.

My banner has now been raised and war has been declared so as to defend the precious sanctity of our innocent children and youth, that you so eagerly toil, day and night, to consume. With me stand the greatest weapons that you have encountered to date - God and the "Moral Majority." Know this, we will defeat you, then heal the damage that you have caused. Modern society has become dispassionate to the cause of righteousness. Many people are so apathetic and desensitized today that they cannot even accurately define the term "morality."

The masses have dug in and continue to excuse their failure to stand against horrendous atrocities such as the aggressive propagation of homo- and bisexuality. Inexcusable justifications such as, "I'm just not sure where the truth lies," or "If they don't affect me then I don't care what they do," abound from the lips of the quantifiable majority.

Face the facts, it is affecting you. Like it or not, every professing heterosexual is have their future aggressively chopped at the roots.

Edmund Burke's observation that, "All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," has been confirmed time and time again. From kindergarten class on, our children, your grandchildren are being strategically targeted, psychologically abused and brainwashed by homosexual and pro-homosexual educators.

Our children are being victimized by repugnant and premeditated strategies, aimed at desensitizing and eventually recruiting our young into their camps. Think about it, children as young as five and six years of age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights.

Your children are being warped into believing that same-sex families are acceptable; that men kissing men is appropriate.

Your teenagers are being instructed on how to perform so-called safe same gender oral and anal sex and at the same time being told that it is normal, natural and even productive. Will your child be the next victim that tests homosexuality positive?

Come on people, wake up! It's time to stand together and take whatever steps are necessary to reverse the wickedness that our lethargy has authorized to spawn. Where homosexuality flourishes, all manner of wickedness abounds.

Regardless of what you hear, the militant homosexual agenda isn't rooted in protecting homosexuals from "gay bashing." The agenda is clearly about homosexual activists that include, teachers, politicians, lawyers, Supreme Court judges, and God forbid, even so-called ministers, who are all determined to gain complete equality in our nation and even worse, our world.

Don't allow yourself to be deceived any longer. These activists are not morally upright citizens, concerned about the best interests of our society. They are perverse, self-centered and morally deprived individuals who are spreading their psychological disease into every area of our lives. Homosexual rights activists and those that defend them, are just as immoral as the pedophiles, drug dealers and pimps that plague our communities.

The homosexual agenda is not gaining ground because it is morally backed. It is gaining ground simply because you, Mr. and Mrs. Heterosexual, do nothing to stop it. It is only a matter of time before some of these morally bankrupt individuals such as those involved with NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Lovers Association, will achieve their goal to have sexual relations with children and assert that it is a matter of free choice and claim that we are intolerant bigots not to accept it.

If you are reading this and think that this is alarmist, then I simply ask you this: how bad do things have to become before you will get involved? It's time to start taking back what the enemy has taken from you. The safety and future of our children is at stake.

Rev Stephen Boissoin

MORE FEMINIST/ABORTION LIES EXPOSED

Spirit & Life®
"The words I spoke to you are spirit and life." (Jn 6:63)
Human Life International e-Newsletter
Volume 03, Number 23 | Friday, June 06, 2008
.................................................................................. www.hli.org
Maternal Deaths Down In Nicaragua Once Abortion Is Eliminated
Unsuspecting pro-life cultures are regularly assaulted by the "logic" of the international abortion promoters who push their anti-life agenda into every culture that will cave in to the pressure. Their main argument goes roughly like this: "When abortion is not legal, women have abortions anyway but in unsafe conditions and back-alley clinics with untrained people who injure and kill them. All this death and injury is totally unnecessary and we could just solve the problem overnight by legalizing abortion to make it safe and keep all these poor women from dying."

That's the main argument which, in one form or another, is repeated ad nauseam by the abortion lobby to sympathetic healthcare providers, social workers, government leaders and the media. It can be an effective argument for legalized abortion because people are generally more willing to sacrifice the rights of the unseen child for the immediate perceived needs of the suffering woman. However, that argument is a ruse. Abortion doesn't work the way they say it does. In reality, legalized abortion, besides killing babies, creates a climate of disrespect for women's health that leads to a greater number of maternal deaths. Let's take another look at the most fascinating and heroic case study in the abortion wars that our modern age has seen: Nicaragua.

That marvelous little pro-life country in Central America is a good example of what happens when a country chooses a culture of life. Remember that Nicaragua made abortion completely illegal in 2006 and then reaffirmed that prohibition in 2007. The overall positive results for Nicaraguan women have been just amazing. The abortion promoters screamed that making abortion illegal would cause women to die in droves because of more back-alley abortions, but that didn't happen. In fact, the opposite is true - fewer women are dying now! A recent publication by Nicaragua's Ministry of Health noted that the overall maternal mortality rate decreased by 58% in the year that abortion has been made totally illegal. There were 21 maternal deaths for 2007 compared to 50 maternal deaths the year before. This is a stunning reversal!

The lie that women will die from back-alley, "unsafe," abortions is nothing but a scare tactic to coerce pro-life cultures into compliance with abortion. The truth is that abortion-free cultures have a greater respect for women and babies and are not subject to that degrading pall of killing that lies over the medical profession. In the case of Nicaragua, their rejection of abortion in 2006/2007 coincided - not surprisingly - with a greater provision of basic pre-natal services for pregnant women and accompaniment in childbirth which is what led to the surprising turn-around in the maternal death rate. Even aside from legal protection of babies, pro-life cultures just protect women better, it's that simple.

We don't have to listen to the liars who tell us that legalized abortion is "safe." Women are much safer in countries where abortion is not legal. Abortion enthusiasts were never able to use the maternal death argument in abortion-free Ireland which has the lowest rate of maternal deaths in the world. They are also confounded by pro-life cultures like Poland that restricted abortion in 1993 and has seen a phenomenal increase in maternal wellbeing ever since.

The abortion promoters tell us that certain abortions are unsafe. They're half right. Actually, all abortions are unsafe. The numbers don't lie.



St. Michael Prayer Campaign to End Abortion


Sincerely Yours in Christ,


Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer,
President, Human Life International

BIG PROFITS FOR BIG FEMINIST INDUSTRY

OR HOW TO MAKE A FAST BUCK FROM THE INNOCENT.

In April, the annual report for Planned Parenthood Federation of America revealed that the abortion giant had a total income of $1.02 billion -- with reported profits of nearly $115 million. Taxpayers kick in more than $336 million worth of government grants and contracts at both the state and federal levels. That's a third of Planned Parenthood's budget.

And what market-distorting results do we get for those government incentives? In 2006 alone: 289,750 abortions

Staying at the Table

For 12 years now the Hamilton-Wentworth Family Action Council (HWFAC) has stayed at the public table in the Hamilton region and during this time have witnessed the demise of Planned Parenthood Hamilton, tremendous decrease in Hamilton’s teen pregnancy rates, the establishment of the Sexual Health Network which now puts their money into the annual ‘Worth
the Wait’ abstinence campaign, and public school sex-ed curriculum which now has a tremendous emphasis on students recognizing that abstinence is best and encourages them to speak with their parents and clergy on sexual matters.

For the past four years HWFAC has also been intensely involved in the public school’s efforts to include sexual orientation in their Equity Policy. We were blessed to be able to have 3 of our directors sit on the sexual orientation steering committee for its’ full 2 year tenure and witness that the goal of the majority of the committee was to have LGBT lifestyles woven into all subject areas beginning in kindergarten, reject medical evidence regarding the high-risk nature of LGBT conduct as bias, use the classroom to promote ‘queer heroes’ and label traditional family values as homophobic and hetersoexist. All in the name of equity.

HWFAC stuck with it regardless of the name calling and hostility we endured. We continued to put up evidence-based arguments against those who would go against the knowledge of God. Finally, despite our strong, yet respectful opposition, the Sexual Orientation Strand went to a public meeting where Trustees were to vote on its’ acceptance. We put approximately 30 hours into a 14 minute delegate presentation which took opportunity to support the school board’s equity vision of ‘A future in which all students can achieve their full potential’ and informed the board that HWFAC fully supports an anti-bullying / anti-harassment for any reason policy and their effort to create a safe environment for all students. We first sent commendations to the board in effort to keep their hearts open for our concerns that would follow.

Our concerns were with the Strand’s anti-homomphobic / anti-heterosexist foundation and its’ potential to label solid evidence-based medical information as homophobic and families who hold that marriage is the union of one man and woman to the exclusion of all others as heterosexist. We explained that as Christians, our families are required to ‘come out and be separate’ meaning to draw boundaries, set limits around our lives and touch no unclean thing including lust, fornication, adultery, homosexuality and bestiality. In our closing we noted that since the staff had stated that they did not know how the strand could be implemented while providing an environment which was safe for our children physically, emotionally, spiritually, socially and intellectually that the strand be set aside and an implementation plan be prepared and submitted to all faith communities for their approval. Trustees that evening did not pass the Sexual Orientation Strand, they voted 8 to 2 to refer it back to staff for a report due June 2. It is not over yet, however a miraculous evening and we pray a turning point.

Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family was once asked, “Why do Christians have such little influence on public policy?” Dr. Dobson replied, “Because Christians do not stay at the table, when things don’t go their way they pick up their marbles and go home.” Christians must return to the public table and occupy the seats. If we do not, others will.

For pdf copies of the presentation please contact us at enosjim@yahoo.com
Jim Enos
FCP candidate
Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale

Bill C-484, A government bill to protect babies in the womb.

Pro-choice activists are against this bill to protect women and their babies in what should be the their safest environment.
Suppose, for a moment, that a group of feminist activists decided to take a cross-country tour and decided along the way to abort as many children as they could. They decided that every time they saw a pregnant woman they would get friendly with them and when the opportunity arose, they would slip an abortion pill into the pregnant woman's drink and quietly walk away.
Eventually, after causing hundreds of abortions they are caught by police. All they could be charged with is a minor offense because there exists no law against killing the unborn.
You could write different variations of this but the same basic truth remains; A child that is wanted by the mother and father is open to any and all assaults without legal protection.

Ontario Minister of Education Forces Homosexuality On Our Children.
Time to remove our kids from public and Catholic school system.


April 17,2008

To: Mr. Ken O'Day

Chairman

Renfiew County Family Action Council

rure@nrtco.net

Dear Mr. O'Day,

Thank you for your email about the teaching of sexual diversity in schools.

Under the Ontario Human Rights Code, every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to

services, goods, and facilities, and without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of

origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family

status or handicap. Our government is strongly committed to upholding this code, and has ensured

these principles are affirmed in curriculum programs and policies for schools.

Publicly funded education strives to teach students to appreciate diversity and respect differences.

Our civil values include respect for sexual orientation. The curriculum is designed to reflect the

diversity of Canada, and teachers are expected to implement the curriculum in such a way that

students can see the variety of their own backgrounds, interests, and experiences reflected in it.

A curriculum review process initiated in February 2003 has been designed to build on the

strengths of the current curriculum and identify areas for improvement. This continuous cycle of

review is not a development of a completely new curriculum, but is intended to ensure it remains

current, relevant, and age-appropriate from Kindergarten to Grade 12.

The revised documents released as part of the curriculum review process now contain a section on

antidiscrimination education that stresses the need for students to respect the diversity of students'

various backgrounds, interests, and experiences. A number of courses in our curriculum policy

documents contain references to sexual orientation, homophobia, and gay rights. The review of the

Social Sciences and Humanities, and the Health and Physical Education curriculum policy

documents is now underway. There is an opportunity as part of these reviews to ensure that the

documents are more inclusive in nature and reflect the diversity of Ontario society.

Providing all students with an opportunity to learn and develop in a safe and respectful

environment is a responsibility in which school boards and schools play an important role. A

positive school climate exists when all members of the school community feel safe, comfortable,

and accepted. Should a component of any course conflict with a religious belief held by a parent or

a student aged eighteen or older, the right to withdraw from that component of the course shall be

granted on the written request of the parent or student.

The Provincial Code of Conduct states that all members of the school community must respect and

treat others fairly, regardless of factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, age, or disability.

Further, the revised Code also states that members of the school community must not engage in

hate propaganda and other forms of behaviour motivated by hate or bias.

In conclusion, as a government we are committed to helping every student reach his or her full

potential in schools that are safe, caring, and inclusive.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Wynne

Minister of Education

Kathleen Wynne, MPP,
Ontario Minister of Education.

Homosexual Indoctrination in our Schools
Over the years we have seen many different activists in our various governments bring their ideas to the people’s table, changing our way of life to suit their own personal agendas. We’ve seen feminist, environmental and homosexual members of parliament bring radically damaging changes to our freedom, our families and our sacred institutions.
They tell us it all leads to equality, justice and peace, yet all it has produced is unlimited abortions, disrespect for the dignity of marriage, more violent teenagers, a confused, muddled society with no direction or values and a host of other social problems asserting themselves each day.
In Ontario, we have a Health Minister and a Minister of Education who have a long record of homosexual activism. Right now Health Min. George Smitherman is upset because homosexuals are not allowed to donate organs, blood or semen because of the dangerous risks from their chosen lifestyles. He would rather put his personal agenda ahead of the health of us all.
Ontario’s first openly lesbian Min. of Education, Kathleen Wynne, helped found a community fundraising group that has donated over $50,000 to homosexual youth organizations. In 2001, she helped pass a measure encouraging public schools to purchase pro-homosexual teaching materials. At Goubourn Middle School in Stittsville, Ont., an Ottawa-based homosexual lobby organization,(see www.jersvision.org) has been invited to bring ‘diversity training’ to grade 7&8 youth this year.
Other ‘inclusive’ programs being introduced to our local schools are not well known. Many public and Catholic school boards refuse to answer any questions. On the surface it appears that our school boards are towing the line for the Min. of Education because that’s where a large part of the money trail begins. In business and government it’s called ‘scratching each other’s back’.
We do know that teacher’s unions, well financed special interest groups and agenda-driven politicians want to indoctrinate young minds with homosexual programs because they failed to convince the majority of rational adults that homosexuality is normal or healthy.
In California, recent laws ban any school texts, events or activities that are not homosexually inclusive in nature including the words ‘mom and dad.’ Laws being introduced in their schools will teach homosexuality as young as kindergarten. Can’t happen here? Check out the ever changing Ontario schools curriculum guide.
Other than the biological and physiological aspects of human sexuality our learning institutions have no right to feed sexual propaganda to our children. We pay our taxes so our children will receive the academic tools to survive in the world, not to support politician’s personal agendas.
Our schools are no longer a safe environment for our children.

Ken O'Day,
Renfrew County Family Action Council.

The radical feminists at the breadnroses blodsite have finally said what they really stand for. They're all hot and bothered this time because of MP Ken Epp's new 'Unborn Victims of Crime Bill' which may protect women and the child they are carrying in their womb. They have exposed themselves this time by telling everyone what they really care about- Their own selfishness.
These are some of their conservative allies who should know better:

Pro-Choice Conservatives:

Leader of the Government in the Senate - Marjory LeBreton.

Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
- Peter MacKay.

Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics - David Emerson.

Minister of the Environment - John Baird.

Minister of Health and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario - Tony Clement.

Minister of Defence - Gordon O'Connor.

Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Metis and Non-Status Indians - Jim Prentice.

Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities - Lawrence Cannon.

Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women - Bev Oda.

Minister of International Co-operation and Minister for La Francophonie and Official Languages - Josée Verner.

Total : 10