Winnipeg Statement: Now in the Trash Heap of History

Social Conservatives United
News & Action Notice
_______________________________________________

After reflecting on the recent pastoral document on Humanae Vitae,
"Liberating Potential", issued by the CCCB today, I have revised my
original commentary:

http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/?p=1319

The Winnipeg Statement can now be relegated to the trash heap of history.

Regards,

John Pacheco
Social Conservatives United
www.socon.ca
www.socon.ca/or_bust/

Can this, hopefully mean the end of the 'Fully Alive' sex education and subsequent homosexual indoctrination in our Catholic schools? There are still a host of liberal agenda educators who will try to ignore this new development so it will be up to our Bishops to bring us back to sanity in education.

Eliminate the HRC's
Canada’s human rights commissions and tribunals are a system parallel to the court system. They are redundant and should be eliminated.

To the people who think that they are unique and provide a “service” different from court system, here is how they are they different:

· They are not bound by rules of evidence, precedent, or courtroom procedure.

· The state pays all the plaintiffs’ legal costs, but defendants must pay their own.

· “Feelings” are accepted as evidence.

· The “likelihood” of damages being incurred, at some indefinite time in the future, substitutes for real damages that can be shown to have been incurred.

· They have the power to “balance rights” and decide whose rights matter most in any given set of circumstances, thus citizens can never be sure, from day to day, what their rights are.

As a result, in Canada real justice is done only when HRC cases are appealed to the real courts.

Who wants to maintain the human rights commissions and tribunals? The people who want to use public money and resources to attack and smear their political opponents.

They have become an instrument for enforcing one’s own views using public money.

They are seeds of "cultural change" implanted into the bureaucracy by previous left-wing governments.

They have become a lobby group paid by the public purse.

They cannot be “reformed”, but need to be eliminated.

Giuseppe Gori, Leader
Family Coalition Party of Ontario

Prominent Psychiatrist: "No Particular Need for Sex-Education"


Commentary by Dr. Philip Ney

OTTAWA, September 4, 2008 (LifeSitenews.com) - I am a retired professor of psychiatry, having taught in 5 universities in different parts of Canada, Hong Kong and New Zealand. I have also run child and adolescent psychiatric units. I have been on school boards. It is from a review of the literature and from my experience that I write this brief opinion.

1) There is no particular need for "sex education." For many centuries there was no sex education, yet children were conceived and their parents enjoyed the process. Discovery of each other and what is pleasant in bed, on the wedding night and thereafter, is an important part of the exciting and unique pleasure that bonds the couple.

2) Sex education inhibits pair bonding. To educate young people about something that comes naturally robs them of the spontaneity and joy of sex that is vitally important for pair bonding and thus family stability.

3) The more sex education, the more sexual self-consciousness. There is substantial evidence that the more sex education, especially on technique, the more the couple is sexually inhibited. The greater the emphasis on sexual performance, the less communication and interpersonal intimacy there is.

4) The more sex education, the more sexual activity. It is quite conclusive now, that the more sex education, the more sexual activity and all the problems that go with that. The introduction of sex education is well correlated with the increase in abortion, STDs and boy-girl interpersonal problems. Good education gives people the desire to try it out or learn more experientially. Paradoxically, in that respect, current forms of sex education are good education but have the wrong results.

5) The earlier the sex education, the younger children explore sex and try various sexual techniques. Present evidence makes it possible to also conclude that the earlier the sex education, the earlier the sexual behavior. Thus sexual education is sexual titillation.

6) In preventing disease and pregnancy, sex education has been a failure. Sex education has had the opposite effect in preventing young people from engaging in "risky sexual behavior."

7) The idea of "safe sex" has failed. Frightening children with the dangers of "unprotected sex", drugs, fast driving, alcohol, etc. for many children has the paradoxical effect of increasing their interest in trying it.

8) The reliance on condoms has been dangerously misleading. There are sexually transmitted diseases (eg. Human Papilloma Virus) for which condoms offer no protection. The most effective use of the best condoms offers 87% protection from lethal HIV, transmitted by anal intercourse. Condom use has failed particularly in Africa. Condom use creates the false impression of safety, thus encouraging sex, when there is a 13% (at least) chance of dying as a result.

9) There is nothing in sex education that cannot be part of a more effective general health education. Everything of value in sex education can be integrated with the necessary knowledge of how the body and mind work. We found that by using the young person's curiosity and letting them discover how their heart, lungs etc. work, gives them a natural desire to protect something very precious - their body and mind.

10) The sex industry profits from sex education. There is an enormous sex industry that financially profits from natural biological drives and makes billions on fashions, condoms, contraceptives, etc. It is understandable they contribute to the sex problems.

11) Sex education creates mind absorbing conflicts and preoccupations. Exposing children to sexual titillation (sex education) creates conflicts and preoccupations that interfere with their mental health, education and personal development.

12) Sex education tends to result in mental images that interfere with the appreciation of nature and art.

13) No sex education teaches the beauty and hazards of pair bonding. To my knowledge there is no sex education program that informs kids about inadvertent pair bonding. Humans are made one flesh through sex. Thus many kinds of sexual behaviour create life long pair bonds. These interfere with the intimacy and durability of a later committed marriage. Statistics indicate that the more "premarital" sex the more extramarital sex.

14) Many kinds of sex education, including "chastity" education, leave a young person with the impression that any kind of sex except vaginal intercourse is okay when it is not.


To visit Dr. Ney's website:
http://www.messengers2.com

Back to Top | Print this Story | Email to a Friend | View Story on LifeSiteNews.com

Do we really need sex education in our schools that contradicts parents ideas especially now that our schools are starting to homo-sex the education?

Massive New Poll: 56% of Canadians Oppose Morgentaler Order of Canada

Poll called 157,115 Canadian households, yielding over 13,000 respondents - Results weighted in regional proportions

July 22, 2008

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jul/08072202.html


(LifeSiteNews.com) - A random telephone poll of Canadian households with 13,324 respondents conducted between July 17-21, 2008 has revealed that 55.8% of Canadians oppose the awarding of the Order of Canada to abortionist Henry Morgentaler.

The national poll commissioned by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) and just completed, by KLRVU polling has a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 1.5%. The data is accurate 19 times out of 20. A breakdown of votes by province is provided.

Beginning with a wave on the east coasts of Newfoundland, ebbing slightly in Quebec and then continuing with a surge in Ontario right to the west coast-the tide of opinion against awarding abortionist Henry Morgentaler has risen, dramatically.

"Whatever side of the abortion debate you are on, many Canadians from all walks of life felt this appointment went way too far and offended too many," said Jim Hughes National President of CLC. "The mass media coverage of the Morgentaler award has given us the largest abortion debate this country has seen in twenty years, and Canadians when they are forced to think about abortion realize it is horrible."

In every region of the country opinion has soured considerably. Ontario is now 58 percent against honoring the infamous abortionist, with the prairies and the Atlantic provinces having two thirds of its citizens against. Even in Quebec support for Morgentaler has dropped to 53 percent.

"Clearly the waves of offended Canadians speaking out have had an impact," says Mary Ellen Douglas, National Organizer CLC. "When a former Lieutenant Governor speaks out and returns his 'Snowflake', disavowing himself from the Order, undoubtedly that is going to have an effect."

Opinion has become the most negative in the Atlantic with Nova Scotia leading the way at 68 percent against. The substantial size of the sample gives some unique insights into the regions. For instance over 400 people were surveyed in Newfoundland alone, even the territories were sampled. With over 13,000+ participants, this survey speaks definitively on the opinion within the country.

Province/Territory: Percentage Against:

BC: 55%

AB: 64%

SK: 65%

MB: 66%

ON: 58%

QC: 47%

NB: 62%

NS: 68%

PEI: 67%

NL : 64%

NWT /NT : 57%

YK : 57%

The Question: "Do you believe abortionist Henry Morgentaler deserves the Order of Canada Press 1 for Yes Press 2 for No"
A French script was used for the province of Quebec.

The extensive scientific poll called 157,115 Canadian households, yielding over 13,000 respondents and the results were weighted in regional proportions. Results have a margin of error of +/- 1.5%, 19 times out of 20. The subgroups may have larger margins of error based on concentration of population. The Targeted Population was Canadian households, respondents were a result of a households that were selected at random, using a random algorithm provided by INFOLIST Canada, of Toronto, ON. Responses were weighted according to geographical area, so that the sample would reflect the actual demographic proportions in the population, using most recent Statistics Canada estimates.

How this poll was conducted: This KLRVU poll was conducted by touchtone technology which polls households across Canada. Using this technology with the voice of a professional announcer all respondents heard the questions asked identically. In theory, with the stated sample size, one can say with 95% certainty that the results would not vary by more than the stated margin of sampling error, in one direction or the other. There are other possible sources of error in all surveys that may be more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. These include refusals to be interviewed, question wording and question order, weighting by demographic control data and the manner in which respondents are filtered (such as, determining who is a likely participant). It is difficult to quantify the errors that may result from these factors.

Fieldwork for this survey was done by KlrVu Research of Winnipeg, Manitoba. Based in Winnipeg, KLRVU Research is a privately owned polling company working private firms since 2006 research services. Core services include research, data collection and macro polling services.

Campaign Life Coalition, together with many other organizations, will continue to urge Canadians to call the Governor General's office and insist that the award be revoked.

This is Henry Morgentaler.

He is about to receive the Order of Canada award.

Here's how he earned it: http://www.abortionno.org/

Here is the letter the Alberta Human Rights Commission ruled is illegal.


Homosexual Agenda Wicked

June 17, 2002

The following is not intended for those who are suffering from an unwanted sexual identity crisis. For you, I have understanding, care, compassion and tolerance. I sympathize with you and offer you my love and fellowship. I prayerfully beseech you to seek help, and I assure you that your present enslavement to homosexuality can be remedied. Many outspoken, former homosexuals are free today.

Instead, this is aimed precisely at every individual that in any way supports the homosexual machine that has been mercilessly gaining ground in our society since the 1960s. I cannot pity you any longer and remain inactive. You have caused far too much damage.

My banner has now been raised and war has been declared so as to defend the precious sanctity of our innocent children and youth, that you so eagerly toil, day and night, to consume. With me stand the greatest weapons that you have encountered to date - God and the "Moral Majority." Know this, we will defeat you, then heal the damage that you have caused. Modern society has become dispassionate to the cause of righteousness. Many people are so apathetic and desensitized today that they cannot even accurately define the term "morality."

The masses have dug in and continue to excuse their failure to stand against horrendous atrocities such as the aggressive propagation of homo- and bisexuality. Inexcusable justifications such as, "I'm just not sure where the truth lies," or "If they don't affect me then I don't care what they do," abound from the lips of the quantifiable majority.

Face the facts, it is affecting you. Like it or not, every professing heterosexual is have their future aggressively chopped at the roots.

Edmund Burke's observation that, "All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," has been confirmed time and time again. From kindergarten class on, our children, your grandchildren are being strategically targeted, psychologically abused and brainwashed by homosexual and pro-homosexual educators.

Our children are being victimized by repugnant and premeditated strategies, aimed at desensitizing and eventually recruiting our young into their camps. Think about it, children as young as five and six years of age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights.

Your children are being warped into believing that same-sex families are acceptable; that men kissing men is appropriate.

Your teenagers are being instructed on how to perform so-called safe same gender oral and anal sex and at the same time being told that it is normal, natural and even productive. Will your child be the next victim that tests homosexuality positive?

Come on people, wake up! It's time to stand together and take whatever steps are necessary to reverse the wickedness that our lethargy has authorized to spawn. Where homosexuality flourishes, all manner of wickedness abounds.

Regardless of what you hear, the militant homosexual agenda isn't rooted in protecting homosexuals from "gay bashing." The agenda is clearly about homosexual activists that include, teachers, politicians, lawyers, Supreme Court judges, and God forbid, even so-called ministers, who are all determined to gain complete equality in our nation and even worse, our world.

Don't allow yourself to be deceived any longer. These activists are not morally upright citizens, concerned about the best interests of our society. They are perverse, self-centered and morally deprived individuals who are spreading their psychological disease into every area of our lives. Homosexual rights activists and those that defend them, are just as immoral as the pedophiles, drug dealers and pimps that plague our communities.

The homosexual agenda is not gaining ground because it is morally backed. It is gaining ground simply because you, Mr. and Mrs. Heterosexual, do nothing to stop it. It is only a matter of time before some of these morally bankrupt individuals such as those involved with NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Lovers Association, will achieve their goal to have sexual relations with children and assert that it is a matter of free choice and claim that we are intolerant bigots not to accept it.

If you are reading this and think that this is alarmist, then I simply ask you this: how bad do things have to become before you will get involved? It's time to start taking back what the enemy has taken from you. The safety and future of our children is at stake.

Rev Stephen Boissoin

MORE FEMINIST/ABORTION LIES EXPOSED

Spirit & Life®
"The words I spoke to you are spirit and life." (Jn 6:63)
Human Life International e-Newsletter
Volume 03, Number 23 | Friday, June 06, 2008
.................................................................................. www.hli.org
Maternal Deaths Down In Nicaragua Once Abortion Is Eliminated
Unsuspecting pro-life cultures are regularly assaulted by the "logic" of the international abortion promoters who push their anti-life agenda into every culture that will cave in to the pressure. Their main argument goes roughly like this: "When abortion is not legal, women have abortions anyway but in unsafe conditions and back-alley clinics with untrained people who injure and kill them. All this death and injury is totally unnecessary and we could just solve the problem overnight by legalizing abortion to make it safe and keep all these poor women from dying."

That's the main argument which, in one form or another, is repeated ad nauseam by the abortion lobby to sympathetic healthcare providers, social workers, government leaders and the media. It can be an effective argument for legalized abortion because people are generally more willing to sacrifice the rights of the unseen child for the immediate perceived needs of the suffering woman. However, that argument is a ruse. Abortion doesn't work the way they say it does. In reality, legalized abortion, besides killing babies, creates a climate of disrespect for women's health that leads to a greater number of maternal deaths. Let's take another look at the most fascinating and heroic case study in the abortion wars that our modern age has seen: Nicaragua.

That marvelous little pro-life country in Central America is a good example of what happens when a country chooses a culture of life. Remember that Nicaragua made abortion completely illegal in 2006 and then reaffirmed that prohibition in 2007. The overall positive results for Nicaraguan women have been just amazing. The abortion promoters screamed that making abortion illegal would cause women to die in droves because of more back-alley abortions, but that didn't happen. In fact, the opposite is true - fewer women are dying now! A recent publication by Nicaragua's Ministry of Health noted that the overall maternal mortality rate decreased by 58% in the year that abortion has been made totally illegal. There were 21 maternal deaths for 2007 compared to 50 maternal deaths the year before. This is a stunning reversal!

The lie that women will die from back-alley, "unsafe," abortions is nothing but a scare tactic to coerce pro-life cultures into compliance with abortion. The truth is that abortion-free cultures have a greater respect for women and babies and are not subject to that degrading pall of killing that lies over the medical profession. In the case of Nicaragua, their rejection of abortion in 2006/2007 coincided - not surprisingly - with a greater provision of basic pre-natal services for pregnant women and accompaniment in childbirth which is what led to the surprising turn-around in the maternal death rate. Even aside from legal protection of babies, pro-life cultures just protect women better, it's that simple.

We don't have to listen to the liars who tell us that legalized abortion is "safe." Women are much safer in countries where abortion is not legal. Abortion enthusiasts were never able to use the maternal death argument in abortion-free Ireland which has the lowest rate of maternal deaths in the world. They are also confounded by pro-life cultures like Poland that restricted abortion in 1993 and has seen a phenomenal increase in maternal wellbeing ever since.

The abortion promoters tell us that certain abortions are unsafe. They're half right. Actually, all abortions are unsafe. The numbers don't lie.



St. Michael Prayer Campaign to End Abortion


Sincerely Yours in Christ,


Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer,
President, Human Life International

BIG PROFITS FOR BIG FEMINIST INDUSTRY

OR HOW TO MAKE A FAST BUCK FROM THE INNOCENT.

In April, the annual report for Planned Parenthood Federation of America revealed that the abortion giant had a total income of $1.02 billion -- with reported profits of nearly $115 million. Taxpayers kick in more than $336 million worth of government grants and contracts at both the state and federal levels. That's a third of Planned Parenthood's budget.

And what market-distorting results do we get for those government incentives? In 2006 alone: 289,750 abortions

Staying at the Table

For 12 years now the Hamilton-Wentworth Family Action Council (HWFAC) has stayed at the public table in the Hamilton region and during this time have witnessed the demise of Planned Parenthood Hamilton, tremendous decrease in Hamilton’s teen pregnancy rates, the establishment of the Sexual Health Network which now puts their money into the annual ‘Worth
the Wait’ abstinence campaign, and public school sex-ed curriculum which now has a tremendous emphasis on students recognizing that abstinence is best and encourages them to speak with their parents and clergy on sexual matters.

For the past four years HWFAC has also been intensely involved in the public school’s efforts to include sexual orientation in their Equity Policy. We were blessed to be able to have 3 of our directors sit on the sexual orientation steering committee for its’ full 2 year tenure and witness that the goal of the majority of the committee was to have LGBT lifestyles woven into all subject areas beginning in kindergarten, reject medical evidence regarding the high-risk nature of LGBT conduct as bias, use the classroom to promote ‘queer heroes’ and label traditional family values as homophobic and hetersoexist. All in the name of equity.

HWFAC stuck with it regardless of the name calling and hostility we endured. We continued to put up evidence-based arguments against those who would go against the knowledge of God. Finally, despite our strong, yet respectful opposition, the Sexual Orientation Strand went to a public meeting where Trustees were to vote on its’ acceptance. We put approximately 30 hours into a 14 minute delegate presentation which took opportunity to support the school board’s equity vision of ‘A future in which all students can achieve their full potential’ and informed the board that HWFAC fully supports an anti-bullying / anti-harassment for any reason policy and their effort to create a safe environment for all students. We first sent commendations to the board in effort to keep their hearts open for our concerns that would follow.

Our concerns were with the Strand’s anti-homomphobic / anti-heterosexist foundation and its’ potential to label solid evidence-based medical information as homophobic and families who hold that marriage is the union of one man and woman to the exclusion of all others as heterosexist. We explained that as Christians, our families are required to ‘come out and be separate’ meaning to draw boundaries, set limits around our lives and touch no unclean thing including lust, fornication, adultery, homosexuality and bestiality. In our closing we noted that since the staff had stated that they did not know how the strand could be implemented while providing an environment which was safe for our children physically, emotionally, spiritually, socially and intellectually that the strand be set aside and an implementation plan be prepared and submitted to all faith communities for their approval. Trustees that evening did not pass the Sexual Orientation Strand, they voted 8 to 2 to refer it back to staff for a report due June 2. It is not over yet, however a miraculous evening and we pray a turning point.

Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family was once asked, “Why do Christians have such little influence on public policy?” Dr. Dobson replied, “Because Christians do not stay at the table, when things don’t go their way they pick up their marbles and go home.” Christians must return to the public table and occupy the seats. If we do not, others will.

For pdf copies of the presentation please contact us at enosjim@yahoo.com
Jim Enos
FCP candidate
Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale

Bill C-484, A government bill to protect babies in the womb.

Pro-choice activists are against this bill to protect women and their babies in what should be the their safest environment.
Suppose, for a moment, that a group of feminist activists decided to take a cross-country tour and decided along the way to abort as many children as they could. They decided that every time they saw a pregnant woman they would get friendly with them and when the opportunity arose, they would slip an abortion pill into the pregnant woman's drink and quietly walk away.
Eventually, after causing hundreds of abortions they are caught by police. All they could be charged with is a minor offense because there exists no law against killing the unborn.
You could write different variations of this but the same basic truth remains; A child that is wanted by the mother and father is open to any and all assaults without legal protection.

Ontario Minister of Education Forces Homosexuality On Our Children.
Time to remove our kids from public and Catholic school system.


April 17,2008

To: Mr. Ken O'Day

Chairman

Renfiew County Family Action Council

rure@nrtco.net

Dear Mr. O'Day,

Thank you for your email about the teaching of sexual diversity in schools.

Under the Ontario Human Rights Code, every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to

services, goods, and facilities, and without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of

origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family

status or handicap. Our government is strongly committed to upholding this code, and has ensured

these principles are affirmed in curriculum programs and policies for schools.

Publicly funded education strives to teach students to appreciate diversity and respect differences.

Our civil values include respect for sexual orientation. The curriculum is designed to reflect the

diversity of Canada, and teachers are expected to implement the curriculum in such a way that

students can see the variety of their own backgrounds, interests, and experiences reflected in it.

A curriculum review process initiated in February 2003 has been designed to build on the

strengths of the current curriculum and identify areas for improvement. This continuous cycle of

review is not a development of a completely new curriculum, but is intended to ensure it remains

current, relevant, and age-appropriate from Kindergarten to Grade 12.

The revised documents released as part of the curriculum review process now contain a section on

antidiscrimination education that stresses the need for students to respect the diversity of students'

various backgrounds, interests, and experiences. A number of courses in our curriculum policy

documents contain references to sexual orientation, homophobia, and gay rights. The review of the

Social Sciences and Humanities, and the Health and Physical Education curriculum policy

documents is now underway. There is an opportunity as part of these reviews to ensure that the

documents are more inclusive in nature and reflect the diversity of Ontario society.

Providing all students with an opportunity to learn and develop in a safe and respectful

environment is a responsibility in which school boards and schools play an important role. A

positive school climate exists when all members of the school community feel safe, comfortable,

and accepted. Should a component of any course conflict with a religious belief held by a parent or

a student aged eighteen or older, the right to withdraw from that component of the course shall be

granted on the written request of the parent or student.

The Provincial Code of Conduct states that all members of the school community must respect and

treat others fairly, regardless of factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, age, or disability.

Further, the revised Code also states that members of the school community must not engage in

hate propaganda and other forms of behaviour motivated by hate or bias.

In conclusion, as a government we are committed to helping every student reach his or her full

potential in schools that are safe, caring, and inclusive.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Wynne

Minister of Education

Kathleen Wynne, MPP,
Ontario Minister of Education.

Homosexual Indoctrination in our Schools
Over the years we have seen many different activists in our various governments bring their ideas to the people’s table, changing our way of life to suit their own personal agendas. We’ve seen feminist, environmental and homosexual members of parliament bring radically damaging changes to our freedom, our families and our sacred institutions.
They tell us it all leads to equality, justice and peace, yet all it has produced is unlimited abortions, disrespect for the dignity of marriage, more violent teenagers, a confused, muddled society with no direction or values and a host of other social problems asserting themselves each day.
In Ontario, we have a Health Minister and a Minister of Education who have a long record of homosexual activism. Right now Health Min. George Smitherman is upset because homosexuals are not allowed to donate organs, blood or semen because of the dangerous risks from their chosen lifestyles. He would rather put his personal agenda ahead of the health of us all.
Ontario’s first openly lesbian Min. of Education, Kathleen Wynne, helped found a community fundraising group that has donated over $50,000 to homosexual youth organizations. In 2001, she helped pass a measure encouraging public schools to purchase pro-homosexual teaching materials. At Goubourn Middle School in Stittsville, Ont., an Ottawa-based homosexual lobby organization,(see www.jersvision.org) has been invited to bring ‘diversity training’ to grade 7&8 youth this year.
Other ‘inclusive’ programs being introduced to our local schools are not well known. Many public and Catholic school boards refuse to answer any questions. On the surface it appears that our school boards are towing the line for the Min. of Education because that’s where a large part of the money trail begins. In business and government it’s called ‘scratching each other’s back’.
We do know that teacher’s unions, well financed special interest groups and agenda-driven politicians want to indoctrinate young minds with homosexual programs because they failed to convince the majority of rational adults that homosexuality is normal or healthy.
In California, recent laws ban any school texts, events or activities that are not homosexually inclusive in nature including the words ‘mom and dad.’ Laws being introduced in their schools will teach homosexuality as young as kindergarten. Can’t happen here? Check out the ever changing Ontario schools curriculum guide.
Other than the biological and physiological aspects of human sexuality our learning institutions have no right to feed sexual propaganda to our children. We pay our taxes so our children will receive the academic tools to survive in the world, not to support politician’s personal agendas.
Our schools are no longer a safe environment for our children.

Ken O'Day,
Renfrew County Family Action Council.

The radical feminists at the breadnroses blodsite have finally said what they really stand for. They're all hot and bothered this time because of MP Ken Epp's new 'Unborn Victims of Crime Bill' which may protect women and the child they are carrying in their womb. They have exposed themselves this time by telling everyone what they really care about- Their own selfishness.
These are some of their conservative allies who should know better:

Pro-Choice Conservatives:

Leader of the Government in the Senate - Marjory LeBreton.

Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
- Peter MacKay.

Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics - David Emerson.

Minister of the Environment - John Baird.

Minister of Health and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario - Tony Clement.

Minister of Defence - Gordon O'Connor.

Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Metis and Non-Status Indians - Jim Prentice.

Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities - Lawrence Cannon.

Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women - Bev Oda.

Minister of International Co-operation and Minister for La Francophonie and Official Languages - Josée Verner.

Total : 10

Out-of-Sight, Out-of-Mind....Homicide

Equality Is Still The Big Lie

Frequent writers to ‘Letters to the Editor’ encounter more things that others wouldn’t normally see. We understand our letters sometimes need to be edited for spelling and a host of mistakes we writers make and we are mostly grateful for the changes. What we don’t understand is when certain editors decide to become social engineers in linguistics.
There seems to be a concentrated effort in today’s media to neuter any reference to mankind unless it is to display a negative side to men. Words in the media have changed to a neutral, non-gender flavour as if sitting on the fence was a virtue. Even some of our churches have jumped on the feminist bandwagon quietly removing as many references to man or father as they can. I still haven’t figured out what the hell a ‘humankind’ is. Maybe it’s some kind of demonic human created by the liberals.
My library contains some of the finest writers of the past and present and along with 12 dictionaries none of them avoid the male gender as much as today’s media do.
In some of my letters I use the term ‘chairman’ in my signature, yet many of the editors remove the ‘man’ part and replace it with ‘person’ or simply make me a chair. I am neither. Neither am I a ‘spokesperson’. If I speak, I speak as a man. Surely you wouldn’t send a spoke or a chair to do a man’s job.
On the other hand, women continually use chairwoman or spokeswoman in the press. I have no problem with that but why aren’t men allowed the same right? This would be no surprise coming from a feminist editor but most editors are men. Even feminists don’t like traitors.
It may seem a minor matter but it seems to be a disturbing trend that we let get out of control, leaving us with a generation of boys with no male identity and men who question their definitive role in society at a time when we need more real men.
Linguistic castration is one way to feminize men but not nearly as effective as teaching our young boys in school that homosexuality is a normal alternative, as our education system is doing today.
Fortunately there’s still a fast buck to be made from Batman and Superman or they’d quickly replace them with She-man, hero of humankind.

Ken

The Crime of Innocence

According to the eye-witness,* ‘The babies little fingers were clasping and unclasping and his little feet were kicking until the murderer forced a scissors into the back of his head and then the baby’s arms jerked out in a deadly spasm.’ No police were called, no charges were made and the murderer continued on to her next victim.
While this may sound like a fictional murder story, it is, in fact, something that happens every day in North America. It’s called late-term abortion and they’re legal right up to the moment of birth in Canada, thanks mostly to feminist organizations that pressure our government for ‘choice’. Their ‘choice’ is the painful murdering of our most innocent.
Why women have chosen to be ruled by these radical feminists for the past 40 years is beyond understanding. Women wanted to think for themselves and hated the idea of anyone ‘controlling’ them, yet by the millions, they still march to the old feminist song and dance about choice, equality and freedom as if it was a product you buy instead of something you earn.
But let’s not lay all the blame on a few mean-spirited women. It took a lot of gutless government men, back in the day, to allow this to happen and it looks like nothing has changed in Ottawa and Toronto.
Most women are against war and killing, yet here we are in the 21st century, and women are killing their healthy babies with our governments blessing and voter’s support, the same voter who would be outraged if it were happening to a pet dog.
As it is now you can be charged, arrested and put in jail for simply threatening an animal but for the most violent crime to a human being, people are financially rewarded. Isn’t it a little odd that we have a higher standard and expectation for a beast than we have for an innocent child in it’s most vulnerable place?

* The eye-witness report was from an RN, as reported in the May/2007 Interim Newspaper.

= liberal/NDP policies.



We need REAL choices.
We need the Family Coalition Party in Ontario.

http://www.insidethecbc.com/facebookprolife

A funny thing happened on the way to experimenting with citizen participation via the Internet…

The CBC recently set up a Facebook group called The Great Canadian Wish List. The idea was that you could create a wish (like “solve world hunger” etc.) or add your name to existing wishes. The top wishes would be broadcast on CBC on Canada Day.

It’s not that it’s not working, just that instead of generic feel-good wishes, the Facebook group’s top wishes are dominated by political causes usually associated with Christian conservative or right-wing groups.

Among the top wishes (as “voted” by people joining the groups) are:

Abolish abortion in Canada
For a spiritual revival in our nation
Restore the traditional definition of marriage
Clearly, some groups actively campaignied for votes, rather than letting the site grow organically. (I’m not saying this is bad, just interesting.) This page even walks people step-by-step through how to add themselves to the pro-life/anti-abortion (pick your wording) group. Some interesting comments at this blog.

CBC reporter Mike Wise was one of the architects of the Facebook idea. In an interview with InsideCBC.com, Wise said he thought the experiment was a success specifically because of the way people used the site. He said he plans to interview the people behind the top wishes, no matter what the topics end up being. “This was an experiment to see how social networks could work to bring out story ideas, and it’s done that.”

“Would people be saying there was a ‘takeover’ if David Suzuki had gone out and asked people to do this? We purposely set out to see what would happen with an unmoderated group,” he said. “Personally, I think this has been a huge success.”

In a related note, this blog’s Seven Wonders of the CBC contest appears to be the target of a takeover attempt as well by fans of CBC Radio 3.

"Who called me just a piece of flesh!!"