Take Back The Money

Get Over It!

It’s that time of the year again when we’re reminded how our governments joyfully waste our money on their biased political agendas. That reminder comes trotting down our streets in the annual ‘Take Back the Night’ march that radical feminists organize so that we men don’t forget how bad we are. Count me out.
The international event is supposed to have originated in the last century, in Germany, to protest an undisclosed number of rapes and violence against women. Thankfully men are not allowed to walk in the march but they can have the ‘privilege’ of lining the routes in solidarity. No kidding!
For 35 years our federal governments have doled out hundreds of millions of our tax dollars for the Status of Women feminist only clubs on the false notion that women are victims of our society. True some women are badly abused but so are men and the vast majority of women and men are perfectly able and capable of making decisions about their lives. Historically, genocides have targeted men and none before or after the Montreal Massacre in the west, have singled out women. It’s no secret that men are reluctant to report violence against themselves, however, according to a 2006 Statistics Canada report 546,000 men did report physical violence from their partners over the previous 5 years which was only 1% less than women.
Modern liberal feminists hypocritically embrace the idea of child murderers and in fact continually revere their hero, mass murderer, Henry Morgentaler yet for all those years’ pro-life organizations, men’s groups, Real Women and millions of volunteers have never received one government dime to support their good causes. You can be darn sure the money-hungry feminists would shut their doors and walk away tomorrow if the government money dried up.
With huge deficits, it’s time for our provincial and federal governments to get out of the last century and stop using our tax dollars to prop up radicals using men as their scapegoat to pad their pockets. It’s long overdue for an independent audit and research into feminist organizations funding including women’s shelters and time for special interest organizations, who believe in their causes, to volunteer their time and money just like the rest of society.
With an overabundance of laws to protect women, policing to enforce them and biased courts that favor women, we’re just wasting our tax dollars propping up a sexist industry.
But thanks for the annual reminder.

Enough is Enough

The Right Honourable Stephen HarperPrime Minister of Canada

Office of the Prime Minister

80 Wellington Street

Ottawa, ON

Canada

K1A 0A2





TO: Prime Minister Harper;



Dear Prime Minister;



In light of facts revealed by the trial and the Judgment of Nathan J. Smith in a Defamation lawsuit IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (2008 BCSC 249) Between: Ken Wiebe (Plaintiff) And Pierrette Bouchard, Isabel Boily, Marie-Claude Proulx, Her Majesty The Queen In The Right of Canada, and The Minister Responsible for the Status of Women Canada (Defendants), and for other reasons also –

I/We Insist that a full Parliamentary Inquiry be held into the Status of Women Canada and its wrongful influence on Legislation, Policy, and the administration of justice in Canada over the duration of its existence. This Inquiry must have the mandate to recommend changes to policy and legislation that it finds to be in error.



Judge Nathan J. Smith, in his BC Supreme Court judgment, said that a Policy Research Report of the Canadian federal government (Status of Women Canada):



· makes claims that are not true.

· is not factual.

· is the ideological opinion of “true believers” and self-described “militant feminists”.

· is slanderous (Defamatory).



Therefore:

Parliament has been misled by at least one Status of Women Canada Research Report.



Furthermore:

· There are other examples legislation and policy that have been influenced by SWC policy research, but we do not know the full extent to which Parliament has been misled and the people of Canada harmed.

· This Report published by Status of Women Canada was judged to be the best policy research of the year 2003. It can reasonably be inferred that the remainder of similar research is of the same (or worse) character.

· Government funding and support of the legal defense of Status of Women Canada has created a perception that there is unjustified discrimination and inequality under the law within the Canadian court system.



As a result of all this:

Ø I/We insist upon a full Parliamentary Inquiry to gauge the full extent of this problem and make reasonable and fair recommendations to repair the errors.



Signed:__________________________________________________________________



Address (optional)_________________________________________________________



Date: ___________________________________________________________________

Feminist Follies

"The one-world government scenario is dialectically based upon economics, environment, and equity – known as the Three E’s. These Three E’s involve global control of the common man’s labor and money, “sustainable” nature, and forcing all commoners into financial sameness. These same intentions are also documented in the U.N. Agenda 21 game plan for our “sustainable” environmental future.
The feminist movement was crafted by the one-world political initiative and invented to create and sustain global depopulation goals. That is and remains the primary mission of the feminist movement.
Women’s “rights” are disallowed definition by culture, religion, personal opinion, or any other social definition minus the feminist movement. In today’s world, we have no choices as women, whatsoever, but to agree to the think tank morality written and coded by this global movement. The feminist movement is no different than the global environmental movement, the global healthcare movement, the global education movement, or the global economy movement. All are social re-engineering tactics used to forward the take over of all world governments, economies, and cultures, and to force all commoners into the custom-made livelihoods and service of corporate-based governors. According to this government, we have no choices but to accept them all."
The above quote is part of an editorial by Nancy Levant at newswithviews.com
What's your opinion?